TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITY v. Chambers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that once an employer produces sufficient evidence “to support a finding of non-retaliation, the case proceeds as if no presumption [under Section 554.004(a)] ever existed”
• explanatory instruction must be correct to be a proper instruction authorized by the rule
• explanatory instruction must be correct to be a proper instruction authorized by the rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).