Skip to main content
· 5/15/1995

Texaco Inc. v. Sanders (In Re Texaco Inc.)

Citations

  • 182 B.R. 937
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 752
  • 1995 WL 334800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a contempt order is the appropriate remedy for violations under § 524(a)(2
  • finding that the “bankruptcy court is undoubtedly the best qualified to interpret and enforce its own orders including those providing for discharge and injunction”
  • holding claim unknown where owners of adjacent land filed environmental action after bar claims date
  • granting motion to reopen Chapter 11 case to enforce injunction provisions in confirmation order against parties engaged in state court litigation
  • discussing when claims for damage to property caused by contamination arise
  • “As appears from the disclosure statement, Texaco’s filing resulted from the highly publicized $10.5 billion verdict in favor of Pennzoil…”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.