· 5/15/1995
Texaco Inc. v. Sanders (In Re Texaco Inc.)
Citations
- 182 B.R. 937
- 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 752
- 1995 WL 334800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a contempt order is the appropriate remedy for violations under § 524(a)(2
- finding that the “bankruptcy court is undoubtedly the best qualified to interpret and enforce its own orders including those providing for discharge and injunction”
- holding claim unknown where owners of adjacent land filed environmental action after bar claims date
- granting motion to reopen Chapter 11 case to enforce injunction provisions in confirmation order against parties engaged in state court litigation
- discussing when claims for damage to property caused by contamination arise
- “As appears from the disclosure statement, Texaco’s filing resulted from the highly publicized $10.5 billion verdict in favor of Pennzoil…”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hardin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.