Skip to main content
· 5/22/1990

Texaco, Inc. v. Groppo

Citations

  • 215 Conn. 134
  • 574 A.2d 1293
  • 1990 Conn. LEXIS 174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • A person’s right to a sum of money, under a statute, “could not have been affected by a subsequent repealing Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.