Skip to main content
· 7/17/1998

Texaco Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Citations

  • 148 F.3d 1091
  • 331 U.S. App. D.C. 237
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 16285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that in Union Pacific Fuels, the court \ inadvertently lent support to the inference\ that absent express language invoking Mobile-Sierra, FERC ordinarily is free to review rates without regard to the Mobile-Sierra presumption (emphasis added)
  • noting that in Union Pacific Fuels, the court “inadvertently lent support to the inference” that absent express language invoking Mobile-Sierra, FERC ordinarily is free to review rates without regard to the Mobile-Sierra presumption (emphasis added)
  • “We will also defer to the agency’s reasonable interpretation both of its own regulations and of contracts that are subject to its rules.”
  • nature of public interest necessary to override a negotiated rate in a private contract is different from and significantly more particularized than the public interest that bears on other utility rate issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Tatel, Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.