Texas Supreme Court· 3/24/1976
Tex-Wis Company v. Johnson
Citations
- 534 S.W.2d 895
- 19 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 235
- 1976 Tex. LEXIS 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “24 years in excess of the 10-year statutory period” constituted long-continued possession sufficient for ouster
- taking into consideration advanced age of witness in determining that her testimony was not judicial admission
- taking into consideration advanced age of witness in determining that her testimony was not judicial admission
- acknowledging Kidd, but noting that holdover tenant’s possession can be considered adverse if “tenancy has been repudiated, and notice of such repudiation has been brought home to the titleholder”
- “[A] change in the use or character of possession of the land is sufficient to support a finding of notice of repudiation”
- “[A] change in the use or character of possession of the land is sufficient to support a finding of notice of repudiation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greenhill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. PoolTexas Supreme Court· 2003-12-19· cited 234×
- Glover v. Union Pacific RailroadTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-02-17· cited 84×
- Miller v. MillerTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-11-13· cited 66×
- Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline, L.P. v. JustissTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-09-05· cited 61×
- Murphy v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-08-30· cited 56×
- United Postage Corp. v. KammeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1979-04-13· cited 46×
- Combs v. Fantastic Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-06-14· cited 36×
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-15· cited 33×
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. PoolTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2000-11-21· cited 27×
- Gulley v. DavisTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-07-01· cited 23×
- Spiller v. WoodardTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-05-02· cited 22×
- Rife v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-12-21· cited 19×
- Radford v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1979-08-30· cited 18×
- Toal v. SmithTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2001-08-01· cited 18×
- Hardaway v. Lou Eda Korth Stubbs NixonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-11-22· cited 18×
- First National Bank of Marshall v. BeaversCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-06-10· cited 14×
- Woodrow v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-12-19· cited 12×
- Dalo v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-07-14· cited 10×
- Witcher v. BennettTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-12-09· cited 10×
- Cleveland v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1977-03-08· cited 9×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1951-07-11· cited 171×
- Griffin v. Superior Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court· 1960-06-15· cited 132×
- Higgins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-11-13· cited 51×
- Sweeten v. ParkTexas Supreme Court· 1955-03-09· cited 48×
- Killough v. HindsTexas Supreme Court· 1960-10-05· cited 36×
- Stafford v. WilkinsonTexas Supreme Court· 1957-07-24· cited 35×
- Mauritz v. ThatcherCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1940-04-18· cited 27×
- Vasquez v. MeadersTexas Supreme Court· 1956-05-23· cited 24×
- Brown v. BickfordCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1951-02-14· cited 12×
- Achille v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1962-10-11· cited 8×
- Tex-Wis Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.