Skip to main content
· 7/15/1986

Tews v. Husqvarna, Inc.

Citations

  • 390 N.W.2d 363
  • 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that objecting counsel is entitled to set forth an objection but cannot automatically argue the merits of the objection nor the correctness of the court's decision on the objection without permission of the court
  • hoIding that objecting counsel is entitled to set forth an objection but cannot automatically argue the merits of the objection nor the correctness of the court's decision on the objection without permission of the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.