Tevis v. O'Connell

Citations

• 21 Cal. 512

Syllabus

<p>A justification by the sureties upon an undertaking bn appeal to the Supreme Court made before a County Judge of a county other than that where the j udgmont was rendered, is not effectual for any purpose.</p> <p>Roush v. Van Hagen (18 Cal. 668) affirmed on this point.</p> <p>Where a motion to reinstate an appeal was opposed on the ground that the undertaking on appeal was invalid, and after argument and submission, was denied on this ground : Held, that it was then too late for appellant to oiler to file a new undertaking. The offer should have been made before the motion was submitted.</p>