Tevis v. Ellison & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[i]n Kentucky[,] the Federal Circuit concluded that a dispute alleging a[] [Randolph-Sheppard Act] violation must be arbitrated and the Court of Federal Claims lacks Tucker Act jurisdiction . . . even if the dispute, by its terms, also fits within § 1491(b
• rejecting a heightened standard and 24 finding the status quo meant the SLA continuing to provide food services \regardless of 25 whether it [was] legally entitled to priority for a new contract.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).