Teutonia National Bank v. Loeb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying permanent injunction because “the plaintiff must show something more [for irreparable harm]—for example, that ‘the potential harm would threaten the [plaintiff’s] very existence’” (internal citation omitted)
• noting permanent injunctions are not meant to remedy economic loss unless funds are in a “precarious financial condition” or “the actuarial soundness of the fund” was compromised
• Where the “Plans have not calculated their damages . . . they have failed to show the amount of interest and liquidated damages due ‘to a reasonable certainty’ on the current record.”
• same where counsel charged $295/hour for 12.2 hours of work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).