Tetreault v. Tetreault

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Rule 60(b)(6) “is not intended to function as a substitute for a timely appeal”
• unessential findings do not provide grounds for reversal even when such findings are incorrect
• “motion for relief... not intended to function as a substitute for a timely appeal”
• using federal decisions in interpreting V.R.C.P. 60(b)
• using federal decisions in interpreting V.R.C.P. 60(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).