Skip to main content
· 5/6/2017

Tetra Tech, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 131 Fed. Cl. 653
  • 2017 WL 1842826

Syllabus

REPORTED OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a bank fraud conviction requires the government to prove, among other things, that the scheme involved a materially false or fraudu‐ lent pretense, representation, or promise
  • noting that a bank fraud conviction requires the government to prove, among other things, that the scheme involved a materially false or fraudu‐ lent pretense, representation, or promise
  • noting that a bank fraud conviction requires the government to prove, among other things, that the scheme involved a materially false or fraudu- lent pretense, representation, or promise
  • noting that a bank fraud conviction requires the government to prove, among other things, that the scheme involved a materially false or fraudu‐ lent pretense, representation, or promise
  • noting that a bank fraud conviction requires the government to prove, among other things, that the scheme involved a materially false or fraudu- lent pretense, representation, or promise
  • holding a promise made without a present intention to keep it can be fraudulent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruggink

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.