· 4/1/2008
Testa v. Geressy
Citations
- 943 A.2d 1075
- 286 Conn. 291
- 2008 Conn. LEXIS 98
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing merits of plaintiffs claims after concluding that trial court improperly declined to review claims
- setting forth well established rules of construction under which “[o]ur fundamental objective is to ascertain and give effect to the apparent intent of the legislature” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- \[t]he process of statutory interpretation involves the determination of the meaning of the statutory language as applied to the facts of the case\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
- “[tjhe process of statutory interpretation involves the determination of the meaning of the statutory language as applied to the facts of the case” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- [o]ur fundamental objective is to ascertain and give effect to the apparent intent of the legislature . . .
- \[o]ur fundamental objective is to ascertain and give effect to the apparent intent of the legislature\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Schaller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.