Skip to main content
· 4/1/2008

Testa v. Geressy

Citations

  • 943 A.2d 1075
  • 286 Conn. 291
  • 2008 Conn. LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing merits of plaintiffs claims after concluding that trial court improperly declined to review claims
  • setting forth well established rules of construction under which “[o]ur fundamental objective is to ascertain and give effect to the apparent intent of the legislature” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • \[t]he process of statutory interpretation involves the determination of the meaning of the statutory language as applied to the facts of the case\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “[tjhe process of statutory interpretation involves the determination of the meaning of the statutory language as applied to the facts of the case” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • [o]ur fundamental objective is to ascertain and give effect to the apparent intent of the legislature . . .
  • \[o]ur fundamental objective is to ascertain and give effect to the apparent intent of the legislature\ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Schaller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.