Skip to main content
· 12/1/2009

Testa v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 685 S.E.2d 213
  • 55 Va. App. 275
  • 2009 Va. App. LEXIS 534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the exclusionary rule -4- is inapplicable to “a new, distinct crime” occurring during an allegedly unlawful detention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.