Testa-Carr v. Sallie Mae

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding dormant commerce clause not applicable to Guam because “the Government of Guam is in essence an instrumentality of the federal government.”
• “There is no reason why Guam should enjoy less immunity than the federal government itself.”
• “In those cases, this court simply assumed that the commerce clause applied, but the issue was never raised or discussed. Such unstated assumptions on non-litigated issues are not precedential holdings binding future de- cisions.”
• \Such unstated assumptions on non-litigated issues are not precedential holdings binding future decisions.\
• exclusive franchise agreement didn't violate antitrust laws or equal protection principles
• “[U]nstated assumptions on non-litigated issues 13 are not precedential holdings binding future decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).