Test Masters Educational Services, Inc. v. Robin Singh Educational Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court must determine whether a party \raised a dispute of fact as to whether consumers associate the mark with only its company\
• holding that continuous eighteen-year use of a mark favored the plaintiff
• upholding trial court’s dismissal of defendant’s counterclaims without prejudice because plaintiff failed to allege “any potential prejudice other than the prospect of additional litigation”
• “On appeal, Singh makes a conelusory argument without addressing any aspects of the district court’s opinion. He has therefore waived review of this argument.”
• “On appeal, Singh makes a conclusory argument without addressing any aspects of the district court’s opinion. He has therefore waived review of this argument.”
• “The public has a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).