Tessera, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that patent exhaustion applied even though the seller failed to pay promised royalties to the patentee
• vacating Commission’s find- ings of no infringement for patents that expired during appeal to this court
• “Nothing in the TCC 18 Licenses limited the licensee’s ability to sell the accused product.”
• vacatur proper where appeal became moot due to “happenstance,” not voluntary action by plaintiff
• vacatur is proper where an appeal becomes moot through happenstance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).