Tessa M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Whether a trial court’s findings are consistent with the child in need of aid statutes is a question of law that we review de novo.”
• “Whether a trial court’s findings are consistent with the child in need of aid statutes is a question of law that we review de novo.”
• “[I]t is the function of the trial court, not of this court, to judge witnesses’ credibility and to weigh conflicting evidence.”
• “[I]t is the function of the trial court, not of this court, to judge witnesses’ credibility and to weigh conflicting evidence.” (quoting In re Adoption of A.F.M., 15 P.3d 258, 262 (Alaska 2001))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).