Tesfamariam v. Woldenhaimanot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court’s failure to administer an oath or address the interpreter’s qualifications did not result in fundamental error
• observing that the general rule in Indiana is that matters not raised in the trial court may not be raised in an appellate court and finding that Mother waived her objections by failing to raise them at trial
• when complaining party does not object to the qualification of the interpreter during trial, the issue is waived for appellate consideration
• when complaining party does not object, the issue is waived for appellate consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).