Skip to main content
· 2/28/2003

Tese-Milner v. Beeler (In Re Hampton Hotel Investors, L.P.)

Citations

  • 289 B.R. 563
  • 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 162
  • 2003 WL 880983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining and applying the Wagoner Rule to a case with several similarities to this case, but also some significant differences
  • denying motion to dismiss based on application of Wagoner to pre-petition conduct because factual allegations in the complaint demonstrated the adverse interest exception may apply, creating a factual issue for later resolution
  • “[I]n considering a motion to disqualify, a court must take into account ’a client’s right freely to choose his counsel ... which ... must be balanced against the need to maintain the highest standards of the profession.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert E. Gerber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.