Skip to main content
· 8/31/2000

Tesch v. Stroud

Citations

  • 28 S.W.3d 782
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 6041
  • 2000 WL 1234381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff not entitled to grace period because attorney mistakenly believed proposed scheduling order governed expert reports
  • plaintiff not entitled to grace period because attorney mistakenly believed proposed scheduling order governed expert reports
  • even if appellant “showed good cause, it was within the trial court’s discretion to grant or deny the extension”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hinojosa, Chavez, Rodriguez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.