Terveer v. Billington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing employee’s claim against LOC for violation of LOC regulations because he had no cause of action and had not shown that LOC had waived sovereign immunity as to such claims
• applying this principle where the plaintiff received a written warning that a negative report following a ninety-day review period would result in the denial of a grade increase; plaintiff made a complaint; and thereafter, the plaintiff was denied a grade increase
• applying this principle where the plaintiff received a written warning that a negative report following a ninety-day review period would result in the denial of a grade increase; plaintiff made a complaint; and thereafter, the plaintiff was denied a grade increase
• “[A]n adverse employment action that was already contemplated before a plaintiff engaged in protected activity 52 cannot be evidence of retaliation.”
• the plaintiff defeated the summary judgment motion by alleging that the defendant de nied him promotions and created a hostile work environment because of the plaintiffs failure to conform to male sex stereotypes solely because of his status as a gay man.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).