Tersigni v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘[u]njust enrichment requires a factual examination of the circumstances and of the conduct of the parties’ . . .
• “[ujnjust enrichment requires a factual examination of the circumstances and of the conduct of the parties” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• \[u]njust enrichment requires a factual examination of the circumstances and of the conduct of the parties\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• determination of quantum meruit claim \requires a factual examination of the circumstances and of the conduct of the parties ... that is not a task for an appellate court [but rather for the trier of fact]\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “The trial court’s findings are binding upon this court unless they are clearly erroneous in light of the evidence and the pleadings in the record as a whole. . . . We cannot retry the facts or pass on the credibility of the witnesses.” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]
• “The trial court’s findings are binding upon this court unless they are clearly erroneous in light of the evidence and the pleadings in the record as a whole. . . . We cannot retry the facts or pass on the credibility of the witnesses.” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).