Skip to main content
· 11/15/2013

Terryl Schwalier v. Chuck Hagel

Citations

  • 407 U.S. App. D.C. 176
  • 734 F.3d 1218
  • 2013 WL 6037195
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Schwalier’s request for back pay, on the other hand, is unambiguously monetary in nature, and he requested it directly from the court.”
  • \To permit plaintiffs to evade the strictures of the Tucker Act by setting forth the formula for their monetary relief rather than asking for a specified amount of 'damages' in so many words would undo the carefully erected structure that Congress set forth.\
  • “To permit plaintiffs to evade the strictures of the Tucker Act by setting forth the formula for their monetary relief rather than asking for a specified amount of ‘damages’ in so many words would undo the carefully erected structure that Congress set forth.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Tatel, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.