Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/21/2012
Terry v. Terry
Citations
- 400 S.C. 453
- 734 S.E.2d 646
- 2012 S.C. LEXIS 272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a purported error in a temporary order should be addressed at the final hearing and a challenge to a final order may be made by appeal of the final order
- holding a perceived error in temporary orders from the family court should be redressed at the final hearing and challenges should be made by appeal of the final order (citing Neville v. Neville, 278 S.C. 411, 411, 297 S.E.2d 423, 423 (1982)
- \Perceived errors in family court temporary orders are to be redressed . . . at the final hearing.\
- \A temporary order of the family court is without prejudice to the rights of the parties.\
- \The family court at the final hearing has the authority to redress any error from the temporary order.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Hearn, Kittredge, Pleicones, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bochette v. BochetteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-11-06· cited 41×
- Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-15· cited 17×
- Neville v. NevilleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-11-23· cited 6×
- Chris v. ChrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-11-06· cited 5×
- County of Greenville v. MannSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-12-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.