Terry L. Manny v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension and Health and Welfare Funds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no conflict of interest where multi-employer plan with equal number of employer and union representatives on appeals committee ruled unanimously and lacked incentive to rule against applicant
• no conflict of interest where multi-employer plan with equal number of employer and union representatives on appeals committee ruled unanimously and lacked incentive to rule against claim- ant
• no conflict of interest where multi‐em‐ ployer plan with equal number of employer and union repre‐ sentatives on appeals committee ruled unanimously and lacked incentive to rule against applicant
• ambiguous plan language created “interpretive task confided” to plan’s trustees
• ambiguous plan language created “interpretive task confided” to plan’s trustees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).