Terry Gilmour v. Gates, McDonald & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff could not raise a new claim in response to the defendant's summary judgment motion
• concluding that the plaintiff could not raise a new claim in response to the defendant’s summary judgment motion
• holding that it was improper for a plaintiff to amend her complaint through an argument opposing summary judgment
• holding that the liberal pleading standard “does not afford plaintiffs with an opportunity to raise new claims at the summary judgment stage”
• holding that a plaintiff may not amend her complaint through argument in an opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment
• concluding that the plaintiff could not raise a new claim in response to the defendant’s summary judgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).