Skip to main content
· 4/23/1993

Terry Gee v. Detective James Pride David Robbins James Conway Nesby Moore Rita Krapf and Vincent Schoemehl

Citations

  • 992 F.2d 159
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8963
  • 1993 WL 124684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidentiary issues reviewed for plain error where objection not made before district court
  • district court’s decisions on admissibility of evidence will not be disturbed unless there is clear and prejudicial abuse of discretion; failure to object to evidence constitutes waiver of right to challenge evidence on appeal, absent plain error by trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Gibson, Magnuson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.