Terry Bemore v. Kevin Chappell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that expert testimony was insufficient to establish prejudice because it only “gave rise to the guilt-phase defense of whether [the petitioner] was able to form the requisite intent” (emphasis in original)
• “counsel can hardly be said to have made a strategic choice when s/he has not yet obtained the facts on which a decision could be made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).