Territory of Hawaii v. Sing Yuen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing possible definitions of substantially gainful employment including nonmarginal employment but concluding that disposing of that case did “not require that we adopt a definition of ‘substantially gainful employment’ ”
• “[u]nder 38 C.F.R. § 4.40 (1990), the VA has a duty to determine functional loss which includes evaluating a veteran’s pain”
• the VA has a duty to determine functional loss which includes evaluating the veteran’s pain
• all remanding cases to the Board because it failed to consider a veteran's claim for disability compensation as a claim for nonservice-connected pension
• Board “merely offered its own opinion” in determining that the appellant’s disabilities did not prevent him from working, “a technique this Court has previously determined to be inadequate”
• a 70% rating alone should trigger the consideration of 4.16(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).