Terri Basden v. Professional Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a plaintiffs “ability to come to work, or to otherwise perform the essential functions of her job, is examined as of the time of the adverse employment decision at issue”
• concluding that plaintiff, in response to employer’s summary- judgment motion, had not pointed to sufficient evidence supporting that her “regular attendance could have expected . . . with any . . . accommodation.”
• noting that employee’s request for an accommodation “requires the employer to engage in a flexible, interactive process to identify a reasonable accommodation”
• holding for employee where “[r]ather than engage in an interactive process, [the employer] denied the request for leave and terminated her”
• “An employer is generally permitted to treat regular attendance as an essential job requirement and need not accommodate erratic or unreliable attendance.”
• “An employer is generally permitted to treat regular attendance as an essen- tial job requirement and need not accommodate erratic or un- reliable attendance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).