Skip to main content
· 10/30/2020

Terrence Bolden v. Su-Taxi Cab, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The dismissal without prejudice was clearly intended as a sanction for perceived discovery abuses. As such, we agree with [the bank] that the trial court erred in failing to include in its order a written finding of willful or intentional defiance of court authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.