Terrell v. Paradis de Golf Holding, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that maritime cases not involving federal statutes do not arise under the laws of the United States for purposes of federal question jurisdiction
• holding that maritime cases not involving federal statutes do not arise under the laws of the United States for purposes of federal question jurisdiction
• holding that the Jones Act choice of law analysis should be applied to general maritime law
• holding that maritime eases not involving federal statutes do not arise under the laws of the United States for purposes of federal question jurisdiction
• holding that, although maritime claims are within federal courts’ original jurisdiction, they are not removable on that basis
• holding that the Lauritzen Court’s factor test “w[as] intended to guide courts in the application of maritime law generally”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).