TERRELL S. WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ERISA § 502(a)(3) “authorizes district courts to grant equitable relief . . . even in the absence of . . . fraud”
• describing plan reformation under § 1132(a)(3) and subsequent enforcement of the reformed plan under § 1132(a)(1)(B) as a two-step process
• identifying “terms violative of ERISA as independent bases that justify the equitable remedy of reformation”
• allowing reformation where the terms of the plan violated ERISA, even in the absence of mistake or fraud
• “[W]e have previously affirmed the entry of a two-step reformation and enforcement remedy under ERISA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).