Terrell Diamond v. Steven Howd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence must be viewed \in the light most favorable to the nonmovant \
• holding that the evidence must be viewed “in the light most favorable to the non-movant ”
• holding in case applying Tennessee law that, when a party “[is] not entitled to discovery before [the] state preliminary hearing, it is not at all clear that . . . [the] preliminary hearing would support collateral estoppel”
• “[G]iven that Diamond was not entitled to discovery before her state preliminary hearing, it is not at all clear that, even if she had participated, her preliminary hearing would support collateral estoppel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).