Terre Du Lac Property Owners' Ass'n v. Shrum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding motion filed two weeks after case was fully tried to be untimely
• “There is no contention that plaintiff’s counsel may have learned anything of a confidential nature in its representation of the corporation in the pollution case that would be helpful to his present client.”
• “There is no contention that plaintiff’s counsel may have learned anything of a confidential nature in its representation of the corporation in the pollution case that would be helpful to his present client.”
• “There is no contention that plaintiff’s counsel may have learned anything of a confidential nature in its representation of the corporation in the pollution case that would be helpful to his present client.”
• “Don Shrum chose to adopt the advantages of the corporate form of doing business with respect to the enterprise that was involved in the litigation in which the corporation was represented by the Roberts firm. There is no evidence that the law firm ever represented Don Shrum individually.”
• “Don Shrum chose to adopt the advantages of the corporate form of doing business with respect to the enterprise that was involved in the litigation in which the corporation was represented by the Roberts firm. There is no evidence that the law firm ever represented Don Shrum individually.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).