Terrance Moore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a “finding that is supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence is deemed conclusive even if the record contains evidence that would support a contrary finding
• stating that “[a] trial court’s finding of fact that is supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence is deemed conclusive even if the record contains evidence that would support a contrary finding”
• stating that “[a] trial court’s finding of fact that is supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence is deemed conclusive even if the record contains evidence that would support a contrary finding.”
• explaining that the trial court has the authority to decide whether a parent’s limited progress toward compliance with the provisions of his or her case plan was -12- IN RE M.A., B.A., A.A. Opinion of the Court reasonable
• noting that the history shown in various reports and orders contained in the record reflected the existence of a sufficient nexus between the conditions that led to the child’s removal and the case plan relating to the mother’s mental health, substance abuse, and medication management issues
• cautioning that “a trial judge should refrain from finding that a parent has failed to make reasonable progress in correcting those conditions which led to the removal of the juvenile simply because of his or her failure to fully satisfy all elements of the case plan goals” (cleaned up

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).