Terrance Flynn v. Marion Thatcher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering remand for factual findings as to intent and noting that parties did not offer evidence of intent in crafting sepa- ration agreement provision at issue, which trial court found to be unambiguous, during evidentiary hearing on motion for contempt
• \[I]t is axiomatic that this appellate body does not engage in fact-finding. Connecticut's appellate courts cannot find facts ....\ [Internal quotation marks omitted.]
• not province of appellate court to find facts or make credibility determinations
• ‘‘[I]t is axiomatic that this appellate body does not engage in fact-finding. Connecticut’s appellate courts cannot find facts; that function is, according to our constitution, our statute, and our cases, exclusively assigned to the trial courts.’’ [Internal quotation marks omitted.]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).