Terran v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that retaliation claims “clearly relate[d]” to student's evaluation and education and were subject to the exhaustion requirement
• holding that retaliation claims “clearly relate[d]” to student’s evaluation and education and were subject to the exhaustion requirement
• concluding that claims based on § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the First Amendment were all subject to the IDEA’s exhaustion requirement
• concluding that claims based on § 1983, the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and the First Amendment were all USCA11 Case: 22-14083 Document: 39-1 Date Filed: 11/13/2023 Page: 5 of 7 22-14083 Opinion of the Court 5 subject to the IDEA’s exhaustion requirement
• finding that parents did not exhaust retaliation claim because they never requested a due process hearing for it specifically, even though they raised the retaliation claim at other IDEA due process hearings
• noting that shotgun pleadings are “frowned upon in this circuit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).