Skip to main content
· 9/25/1985

Terra Properties, II v. Berks County Tax Claim Bureau

Citations

  • 92 Pa. Commw. 97
  • 498 A.2d 57
  • 1985 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the district court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s claim because “he abandoned it by not addressing it in his response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss”
  • finding the district court correctly dismissed plaintiff’s claim because he did not address it in response to defendants’ motion to dismiss
  • stating Goss governs analysis of 12 five-day extension of student’s suspension
  • “The district court correctly dismissed Plaintiff’s facial challenge here because he abandoned it by not addressing it in his response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
  • “The district court correctly dismissed Plaintiff’s facial challenge here because he abandoned it by not addressing it in his response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
  • “The district court correctly dismissed Plaintiff’s facial challenge here because he abandoned it by not addressing it in his response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, Kalish, Palladino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.