· 9/25/1985
Terra Properties, II v. Berks County Tax Claim Bureau
Citations
- 92 Pa. Commw. 97
- 498 A.2d 57
- 1985 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the district court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s claim because “he abandoned it by not addressing it in his response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss”
- finding the district court correctly dismissed plaintiff’s claim because he did not address it in response to defendants’ motion to dismiss
- stating Goss governs analysis of 12 five-day extension of student’s suspension
- “The district court correctly dismissed Plaintiff’s facial challenge here because he abandoned it by not addressing it in his response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
- “The district court correctly dismissed Plaintiff’s facial challenge here because he abandoned it by not addressing it in his response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
- “The district court correctly dismissed Plaintiff’s facial challenge here because he abandoned it by not addressing it in his response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Craig, Kalish, Palladino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.