Skip to main content
· 3/26/1992

Terpstra v. Terpstra

Citations

  • 588 N.E.2d 592
  • 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 344
  • 1992 WL 55875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that factors applied in determining whether to impute full-time income to stay-at-home parent are necessarily case-specific
  • concluding trial court did not abuse discretion in declining to impute additional child care costs to basic support obligation where underemployed Mother testified she would incur additional child care costs if she worked full-time, but did not provide evidence of those costs
  • ap­ plying Indiana Child Support Guideline 1
  • applying Indiana Child Support Guideline 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conover, Chezem, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.