TERNOOIS, III, FRANKLIN G., PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing courts must avoid interpreting a contract in a way that would render provisions “redundant and superfluous”
• noting that a tortious interference claim “is not subject to the MTCA.”
• finding the MTCA applies to a former employee’s claim alleging a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
• “The Supreme Court has now held that [the MTCA applies] to claims alleging ‘breach of [an] implied term or condition of any . . . contract.’”
• “The Supreme Court has now held that [the MTCA applies] to claims alleging ‘breach of an implied term or condition of any . . . contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).