Terlizzi v. Brodie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the use of false pretenses to entice a defendant from beyond the court’s territorial jurisdiction to within it is ground for upsetting service”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DeMartino v. Rivera
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-03-20· cited 15×
• USHA Holdings, LLC v. Franchise India Holdings Ltd.
  E.D. New York· 2014-03-27· cited 10×
• Hammett v. Hammett
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-02-21· cited 7×
• Gudavadze v. Kay
  S.D. New York· 2008-05-30· cited 4×
• Wolfe v. Fazzini
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1975-11-06· cited 3×
• Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. Koenigsberg
  Civil Court of the City of New York· 1986-11-19· cited 1×
• Dantin v. Masi
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-05-01

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shillman v. Toulson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1925-01-09· cited 8×
• Garabettian v. Garabettian
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1923-11-02· cited 5×
• Neotex Manufacturing Co. v. Eidinger
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1937-04-09· cited 4×