Terhune v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to vacate on the basis of mootness when movant failed to present any argument that granting the vacatur would serve the public interest or prevent an inequity
• ORAP 8.54 “requires notice to the court, by implication, within a reasonable time, after the party learns the perti- nent facts regarding mootness.”
• ORAP 8.54 “requires notice to the court, by implication, within a reasonable time, after the party learns the perti- nent facts regarding mootness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hemenway
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-04-25· cited 44×
• State v. Nix
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-03-05· cited 20×
• Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. State
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-22· cited 4×
• Wintle v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-02· cited 1×
• HealthSouth of Alabama, LLC v. Shelby Ridge Acquisition Corp.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2016-04-29

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Huffman v. Alexander
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1952-12-06· cited 82×
• Kerr v. Bradbury
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-03-23· cited 36×
• Kerr v. Bradbury
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-08-03· cited 15×
• Terhune v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-12-21· cited 2×
• Sharvy v. Secretary of Oregon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-10-27· cited 1×