Teresa Anne Henderson v. Walled Lake Consolidated Schools, a Michigan School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “palpable defect” standard is not inconsistent with requiring a showing of “(1) a clear error of law; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) an intervening change in controlling law; or (4) a need to prevent manifest injustice”
• setting forth the elements for a motion to amend judgments under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
• stating that “[a] district court may grant a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment only if” a movant demonstrates that there is “(1) a clear error of law; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) an intervening change in controlling law; or (4
• defendant did not have actual notice despite knowledge that employee made phone calls and sent email messages to plaintiff “at odd hours” and that he “engaged ... in counseling-type discussions” with plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).