Terence Philip Ramsden v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where three of the four factors favored an exercise of equitable jurisdiction, the court had power to hear a Rule 41(g) motion
• holding that where three of the four factors favored an exercise of equitable jurisdiction, the court had power to hear a Rule 41(g) motion
• holding that where three of the four factors favored an exercise of equitable jurisdiction, the court had power to hear a Rule 41(g) motion
• holding that three factors justified exercise of equitable jurisdiction to hear Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g) motion
• recognizing that “district courts have the power to entertain motions to return property seized by the government when there are no criminal proceedings pending against the movant”
• holding that three factors justified exercise of equitable jurisdiction to hear Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).