Skip to main content
· 12/6/1995

Terek v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 668 A.2d 131
  • 542 Pa. 453
  • 1995 Pa. LEXIS 1292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • single phrase should not be extracted from deposition to conclude that opinion is equivocal
  • single phrase should not be extracted from deposition to conclude that opinion is equivocal
  • issue of whether a physician’s testimony is unequivocal is one of law subject to plenary review, rather than one of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro, Rule, Administration

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.