Skip to main content
· 4/18/2012

Terek v. Bundy

Citations

  • 468 B.R. 916
  • 2012 WL 1357548
  • 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 1756
  • 56 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that determination of securities violation under § 523(a)(19)(A) must be made by a tribunal other than the bankruptcy court
  • refusing to adopt an interpretation that would render a provision in the statute meaningless
  • “Should the bankruptcy court be the appropriate forum to conclude that the requiremen[t]s of subpart (A) have been met, subpart (B) is superfluous. The existence of subsection (B) to § 523(a)(19

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patricia C. Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.