Skip to main content
· 6/8/2007

Tennison v. Nevels

Citations

  • 965 So. 2d 425
  • 2006 La.App. 1 Cir. 2124
  • 2007 La. App. LEXIS 1181
  • 2007 WL 1651241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • taking judicial notice of transcript relevant to issue of whether defense attorney had conflict of interest
  • taking judicial notice, in context of conflict of interest claim, of transcript from another defendant’s case and other court files not referenced in trial court
  • taking judicial notice of transcript relevant to issue of whether defense attorney had conflict of interest
  • reviewing claim without determining whether it was preserved because defendant could not prevail on claim
  • reviewing potentially unpreserved claim without deciding whether claim preserved because party clearly could not prevail
  • when evidence of conflict of interest is sufficient to alert reasonable trial court that defendant’s sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel is in jeopardy, trial court has duty to inquire into conflict sua sponte

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, McDonald, Whipple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.