Tennis v. Fedorwicz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that expert testimony is necessary to prove negligent design
• holding that expert testimony is necessary to prove negligent design
• holding that expert testimony is necessary to prove negligent design
• holding that expert testimony is necessary to prove negligent design
• requiring expert testimony to aid jury in determining if highway was safe
• expert testimony required where subject matter of inquiry involves special skills and training not common to the lay person.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).