Skip to main content
· 11/21/2005

Tennille v. State

Citations

  • 622 S.E.2d 346
  • 279 Ga. 884
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3509
  • 2005 Ga. LEXIS 848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that other states “have crafted means by which the defense can have meaningful access” to contraband materials “at the heart of the prosecution”
  • noting that other states “have crafted means by which the defense can have meaningful access” to contraband materials “at the heart of the prosecution”
  • noting the means crafted by appellate courts in Tennessee, Nevada, Arizona and California to ensure criminal defense counsel faced with a statute similar to OCGA § 16-12-100 (b) (5) meaningful access to the contraband at the heart of the criminal prosecution of their client
  • “A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adversely impacts that party’s rights.”
  • “‘A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adversely impacts that party’s rights.’”
  • whether evidence was sufficient to rebut any inference that arose was a question for the trier of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.